Week 8

 Video 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY9x0RyxVPE

1. is the topic well covered? 

Yes, the topic is well covered,d discussing an anecdote and relevant information.

2. is the presentation clear?

The information and narrators are all clear, making it easy to digest.

3. how is the quality of the research?

The quality is great in the video, they go in-depth, and in the description, they put sources if we want to further research.

4. how is the quality of the video production?

The video has great production, relevant video with voice overlay, good transitions in and out, and music that cuts in and out depending on what is being discussed.

5. is the video engaging and interesting?

Yes, the video is engaging and interesting. The creators didn't use a slide show and showed their face. While using an anecdote, using actual news broadcasts, and music that added to the video.

6. is the team work evident?

Yes, I would say that teamwork is evident, They seemed to agree on how they will produce the video with mostly their face showing and discussing information. I can tell there was a lot of background talk when producing this video.

7. is the video appropriate to the audience (either general public or technology professionals)

The video is appropriate for technological audiences, you can tell from the diction and content discussed in the video. 



Video 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4WZz3PkMGQ

1. is the topic well covered? 

Yes the topic is well covered, there is an intro, discussion of growing threats, how it works, etc.

2. is the presentation clear?

Yes, the presentation is clear. Relevant images and gifs are used along with the text. If I were to change one thing, I would bullet point the slides further and narrate instead of reading verbatim.

3. how is the quality of the research?

The quality seems good, the slides are very in-depth and educational.

4. how is the quality of the video production?

The quality of production is fine, mostly just showing google slides and using voices for narration.

5. is the video engaging and interesting?

The video is not very engaging as it is mostly just reading off slides while staring at one image or gif the whole time till the next slide.

6. is the team work evident?

The teamwork wasn't as evident, it seems like they divided up the work into slides.

7. is the video appropriate to the audience (either general public or technology professionals)

The video is appropriate for the audience, the information goes in-dept,h that the general public wouldn't understand.



Video 3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xedIU8Ir14

1. is the topic well covered? 

The topic is well covered, discussing quantum computing in depth.

2. is the presentation clear?

Yes, the presentation is clear, I like how they used transitions for what they were talking about, so you aren't facing word vomit all at the same time.

3. how is the quality of the research?

The quality of the research is well, they cited all their work for each slide.

4. how is the quality of the video production?

The quality is good and simple, using google slides and narration, I think the part that elevates it is the words coming in as they are being spoken. Making it easy to follow.

5. is the video engaging and interesting?

The topic is interesting and the narrators made it engaging by not sounding flat and using transitions.

6. is the team work evident?

Yes, the teamwork is evident, they displayed on each slide who edited and collaborated on each slide. also their narrations link together.

7. is the video appropriate to the audience (either general public or technology professionals)

The video is appropriate for technology professionals, the diction used is advanced and certainly not for the general public. 



Part 2

https://youtu.be/zbHw68x0-vQ - Tech Audience

https://youtu.be/2n71AXy3teg - General Audience

In this class, I learned more about writing and how to be a good writer, and how I can use AI ethically for my writing materials if the class permits so. My team collaborated through the app called Discord. It is great for organization, discussion, and communication. We were able to effectively coordinate and structure our group projects well using the app. Any other teamwork was done on google docs and google slides. I would change nothing for next time as the collaboration was extremely effective.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 1

Week 4

Week 2